Message boards : Number crunching : Rosetta Mini for Android is not available for your type of computer.
Author | Message |
---|---|
googloo Send message Joined: 15 Sep 06 Posts: 133 Credit: 22,715,646 RAC: 4,175 |
This Rosetta server problem causes a 24-hour delay in my computer connecting with Rosetta. I have now had to manually update Rosetta five times in the last two days in order to avoid running out of Rosetta tasks. This is not the first time I have raised this problem. Please fix this. |
Wiktor Jezioro | lakewik.pl Send message Joined: 22 Feb 15 Posts: 4 Credit: 24,056,394 RAC: 0 |
I have same problem |
Luigi R. Send message Joined: 7 Feb 14 Posts: 39 Credit: 2,045,527 RAC: 0 |
Same problem here. 22-Jun-2016 14:51:23 [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 22-Jun-2016 14:51:23 [rosetta@home] No work sent 22-Jun-2016 14:51:23 [rosetta@home] Rosetta Mini for Android is not available for your type of computer. 22-Jun-2016 14:51:23 [rosetta@home] (won't finish in time) BOINC runs 81.4% of time, computation enabled 72.7% of that That's not true! Indeed, after manual update some minutes later... 22-Jun-2016 15:35:14 [rosetta@home] Scheduler request completed: got 25 new tasks I need to use a small task queue. Unfortunately this forces me to switch to another project. |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 1 Dec 05 Posts: 1994 Credit: 9,623,704 RAC: 9,591 |
This is not the first time I have raised this problem. Please fix this. Admins seem to be NOT so interested to resolve this |
Dr. Merkwürdigliebe Send message Joined: 5 Dec 10 Posts: 81 Credit: 2,657,273 RAC: 0 |
Solution: Drop the support for smartphones and tablets and concentrate on enabling AVX2. This should have a much higher priority. |
Luigi R. Send message Joined: 7 Feb 14 Posts: 39 Credit: 2,045,527 RAC: 0 |
Solution: Drop the support for smartphones and tablets and concentrate on enabling AVX2. This should have a much higher priority. Totally agree. Anyway a temporary "solution": -block work request of all project except Rosetta -increase queue days (e.g. 7) -flood rosetta server for 2 hours (a request every 4 minutes) Now I have got more than 400 tasks and my host will not get dried. |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2125 Credit: 41,228,659 RAC: 10,982 |
Solution: Drop the support for smartphones and tablets and concentrate on enabling AVX2. This should have a much higher priority. But may be counter-productive if you can't meet the current shorter deadlines while leaving less tasks available for others to run. With the number of active users doubling over the last two months, Rosetta's becoming a victim of its own success. The solution is to make some additional resource available to make work |
Luigi R. Send message Joined: 7 Feb 14 Posts: 39 Credit: 2,045,527 RAC: 0 |
I can meet the deadlines. |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 1 Dec 05 Posts: 1994 Credit: 9,623,704 RAC: 9,591 |
Solution: Drop the support for smartphones and tablets and concentrate on enabling AVX2. This should have a much higher priority. +1 |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2125 Credit: 41,228,659 RAC: 10,982 |
I can meet the deadlines. That's good, but a bit surprising if you hold a 7-day buffer but half the tasks have a deadline of 2 or 5 days rather than the more usual 14 days |
Luigi R. Send message Joined: 7 Feb 14 Posts: 39 Credit: 2,045,527 RAC: 0 |
I can meet the deadlines. Deadline of 2 is rare. 5 days is enough to complete 240 4-hour tasks. If I set 7 days of work queue, it's not my mistake whether BOINC software downloads work that's expiring in 5 days. Indeed very few tasks were going to expire in 5 days. As a last resort if I want to meet deadlines and I can't do it, I could switch to 1-hour configuration and update preferences. Then all the starting tasks will get cpu_run_time_pref=3600. In my case the required time to complete tasks would be divided by 4. Finally I don't think my '24/7 effort' is comparable to server work to generate tasks and according to me a deadline of 5 days doesn't mean "hurry up!". Some administrators of other projects say "feel free to abort tasks if you need" too. I don't know if a participation by this behaviour could damage Rosetta@home project, but I think not. |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Some administrators of other projects say "feel free to abort tasks if you need" too. Certainly, abort 'em if you must. They will quickly be reassigned. As you say, reducing your preference for runtime can clear work quickly. Beware that the change pertains to tasks still running too. And if your new preference precedes the current CPU time on a task by 4 hours, this can lead to the task thinking it is hung up and closing out. To avoid this, I sometimes reduce runtime in notches over the course of an afternoon. Or, if timing works out better, I'll suspend a couple of tasks that have run a long time, clear through the work, and then bump the runtime preference back up (and doing an update to project) before releasing them again. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2125 Credit: 41,228,659 RAC: 10,982 |
I can meet the deadlines. I'm getting around a third of tasks with a 2-day deadline - maybe why I thought differently. But if it's working out for you without manually intervening, that's great. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Rosetta Mini for Android is not available for your type of computer.
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org