Message boards : Number crunching : rsc_fpops_est for certain WU types (ordered_X)
Author | Message |
---|---|
Ananas Send message Joined: 1 Jan 06 Posts: 232 Credit: 752,471 RAC: 0 |
Some WU types report only about 60% of the RSC_FPOPS_EST value they should have. This messes up the cache handling, as de facto they have the same runtime as the other results. Examples are those with this pattern : tj_8_7_ordered_X* My preferred runtime setting is 8 hours, after one of those strange ones, the estimated runtime of all "normal" workunits goes up to about 12 hours, even though they usually still finish within my runtime preferences. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
rsc_fpops_est for certain WU types (ordered_X)
©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org