Rosetta@Home version 3.30

Message boards : Number crunching : Rosetta@Home version 3.30

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
Mod.Sense
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Aug 06
Posts: 4018
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 72911 - Posted: 28 Apr 2012, 14:13:24 UTC

Please post any issues that seem specific to Rosetta@home version 3.30 in this thread.

v3.30 Addresses issues with Cartesian Relax and the modeling of disulfides in the hybrid protocol for comparative modeling.
Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense
ID: 72911 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Rocco Moretti

Send message
Joined: 18 May 10
Posts: 66
Credit: 585,745
RAC: 0
Message 72913 - Posted: 28 Apr 2012, 19:25:47 UTC

Version 3.30 also fixes the MacOS slowdown issue people were seeing with versions 3.24 and 3.26.
ID: 72913 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mike

Send message
Joined: 30 Apr 09
Posts: 44
Credit: 65,019
RAC: 0
Message 72915 - Posted: 28 Apr 2012, 21:16:42 UTC

Rocco, I know you are very busy, but is there a quick implementation you could put out that converts at least one type of silent file to pdb

- Thanks
Michael
ID: 72915 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [AF>Le_Pommier>MacBidouille.com]Prof
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Jun 07
Posts: 3
Credit: 5,871,723
RAC: 0
Message 72925 - Posted: 29 Apr 2012, 13:24:43 UTC
Last modified: 29 Apr 2012, 13:26:52 UTC

Hi all!!

I just try the new version (3.30).
Work units fail to initialize and produce only errors!

like this:

Dim 29 avr 15:08:58 2012 | rosetta@home | Task rb_04_28_31019_62140__t000__2_C1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_49285_696_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
Dim 29 avr 15:08:58 2012 | rosetta@home | If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.
Dim 29 avr 15:08:58 2012 | rosetta@home | Restarting task rb_04_28_31019_62140__t000__2_C1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_49285_696_0 using minirosetta version 330 in slot 14
Dim 29 avr 15:09:00 2012 | rosetta@home | Task rb_04_28_31019_62140__t000__2_C1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_49285_696_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
Dim 29 avr 15:09:00 2012 | rosetta@home | If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.
Dim 29 avr 15:09:00 2012 | rosetta@home | Restarting task rb_04_28_31019_62140__t000__2_C1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_49285_696_0 using minirosetta version 330 in slot 14
Dim 29 avr 15:09:01 2012 | rosetta@home | Task rb_04_28_31019_62140__t000__2_C1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_49285_696_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
Dim 29 avr 15:09:01 2012 | rosetta@home | If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.
Dim 29 avr 15:09:01 2012 | rosetta@home | Restarting task rb_04_28_31019_62140__t000__2_C1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_49285_696_0 using minirosetta version 330 in slot 14
Dim 29 avr 15:09:02 2012 | rosetta@home | Task rb_04_28_31019_62140__t000__2_C1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_49285_696_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
Dim 29 avr 15:09:02 2012 | rosetta@home | If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.
Dim 29 avr 15:09:02 2012 | rosetta@home | Restarting task rb_04_28_31019_62140__t000__2_C1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_49285_696_0 using minirosetta version 330 in slot 14

Could you have a look at this??

My computer : Mac Pro 8 cores HT, OS X 10.6.8, 24GB RAM, Boinc manager 7.0.20
ID: 72925 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Rocco Moretti

Send message
Joined: 18 May 10
Posts: 66
Credit: 585,745
RAC: 0
Message 72928 - Posted: 29 Apr 2012, 21:53:12 UTC - in response to Message 72925.  

Boinc manager 7.0.20


This may be your issue - the 7.0 series pre-7.0.25 were all alpha versions, and aren't recommended anymore. I recall that several of them had permissions issues with downloading the Rosetta@home application (from what I can best tell, this is what's happening to you).

I'd recommend either upgrading to 7.0.25 (although people are reporting problems with that version and Rosetta@home), or going back to an older version like 6.12.35 (though the 7->6 transition isn't as straightforward as upgrading https://boinc.bakerlab.org/forum_thread.php?id=5943#72919).
ID: 72928 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Plomos

Send message
Joined: 4 Mar 11
Posts: 11
Credit: 439,043
RAC: 0
Message 72943 - Posted: 30 Apr 2012, 20:51:22 UTC

It seems that the new version of rosetta runs the WUs slower. (or maybe its just me) I've noticed that when running rb_04_29 WUs that the steps per model seem to move much slower. Is this because they are CASP units or because of the new 3.30 version?
ID: 72943 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
zioriga

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 9
Credit: 4,270,043
RAC: 941
Message 72944 - Posted: 30 Apr 2012, 21:10:08 UTC

Windows XP 64 with BOINC 7.0.26 64b

Every WU aborts with Computation error. In preferencies I set a Target CPU run time of 16 hours.
this is the log message:
4/30/2012 11:07:04 PM | rosetta@home | Output file rb_04_29_31054_62231_h002__t0543_IGNORE_THE_REST_04_07_49377_28_0_0 for task rb_04_29_31054_62231_h002__t0543_IGNORE_THE_REST_04_07_49377_28_0 absent

Now I reverted back to 12 hours. As soon as I'll receive those new WUs, I'll check this behaviour
ID: 72944 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Plomos

Send message
Joined: 4 Mar 11
Posts: 11
Credit: 439,043
RAC: 0
Message 72945 - Posted: 30 Apr 2012, 21:14:24 UTC

It seems i just ran into 2 particularly large WUs and that is why the steps for them were running slower than what I normally see.
ID: 72945 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Theadalus

Send message
Joined: 6 Nov 05
Posts: 7
Credit: 9,945,810
RAC: 0
Message 72951 - Posted: 1 May 2012, 5:10:41 UTC - in response to Message 72944.  
Last modified: 1 May 2012, 5:25:32 UTC

Every WU aborts with Computation error. In preferencies I set a Target CPU run time of 16 hours.
this is the log message:
4/30/2012 11:07:04 PM | rosetta@home | Output file rb_04_29_31054_62231_h002__t0543_IGNORE_THE_REST_04_07_49377_28_0_0 for task rb_04_29_31054_62231_h002__t0543_IGNORE_THE_REST_04_07_49377_28_0 absent

I have the same problem, but if i look at the behaviour, it almost looks like a "1st of May" bug.
Yesterday (30th of April) i joined a new machine (i7-2600 running Ubuntu 10.10 x64 and BOINC v6.12.34). Over a period of time machine received 140+ WU's, everything went fine, WU's were calculated and reported ok. According to boinc.log file, it seems all WU's verified after 04/30/2012 23:59:59 UTC generated error below?!?

<core_client_version>6.12.34</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
app_version download error: couldn't get input files:
<file_xfer_error>
  <file_name>minirosetta_3.30_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu</file_name>
  <error_code>-120</error_code>
  <error_message>signature verification failed</error_message>
</file_xfer_error>

</message>
]]>


I did a project reset, but as BOINC says "(reached daily quota of 8 results)", no new WU's received so far...

[Edit]
Forgot to mention i remotely connected to client with BOINC Manager v7.0.25 x64, just to check progress, then saw all WU's errored. Can this be an issue, although i used same manager to add Rosetta to client projects...?
ID: 72951 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Theadalus

Send message
Joined: 6 Nov 05
Posts: 7
Credit: 9,945,810
RAC: 0
Message 72952 - Posted: 1 May 2012, 5:12:49 UTC - in response to Message 72951.  
Last modified: 1 May 2012, 5:13:31 UTC

Sorry, wrong button...
ID: 72952 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
zioriga

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 9
Credit: 4,270,043
RAC: 941
Message 72953 - Posted: 1 May 2012, 5:23:03 UTC

1'st of May bug or not, with 12 hours of Task CPU time, now it's running fine
ID: 72953 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
zioriga

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 9
Credit: 4,270,043
RAC: 941
Message 72957 - Posted: 1 May 2012, 5:53:00 UTC

Correction, after 1hr 28m one WU aborted with the same error type as before
ID: 72957 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Rocco Moretti

Send message
Joined: 18 May 10
Posts: 66
Credit: 585,745
RAC: 0
Message 72963 - Posted: 1 May 2012, 16:32:55 UTC - in response to Message 72944.  

zioriga:

Windows XP 64 with BOINC 7.0.26 64b


As far as I'm aware, the latest released version of the BOINC client is 7.0.25. How did you come by 7.0.26? Are you alpha testing the next version?

At any rate, it looks like you're seeing the same "Incorrect Function" issue that others have reported with 7.0.25. We unfortunately don't have a solution for it yet.

==

Grutte Pier [Wa Oars]~Theadalus:

It looks like you're having an issue downloading files from the Rosetta@home server. I would take a look at your network connection and firewalls, to see if there's a configuration issue that might be preventing file download or corrupting it.
ID: 72963 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
zioriga

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 9
Credit: 4,270,043
RAC: 941
Message 72965 - Posted: 1 May 2012, 17:35:20 UTC

Yes I'm a BOINC alpha tester
ID: 72965 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Theadalus

Send message
Joined: 6 Nov 05
Posts: 7
Credit: 9,945,810
RAC: 0
Message 72971 - Posted: 2 May 2012, 17:02:25 UTC - in response to Message 72963.  
Last modified: 2 May 2012, 17:05:48 UTC

Grutte Pier [Wa Oars]~Theadalus:

It looks like you're having an issue downloading files from the Rosetta@home server. I would take a look at your network connection and firewalls, to see if there's a configuration issue that might be preventing file download or corrupting it.

Yesterday machine start receiving wu's again, most of them are calculated and reported ok, but still client errors occur.
All client errors are related to 'segmentation violation' (error code 193).

Machine results: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?hostid=1538006&offset=120

The machine participated 24/7 at Docking@Home without any problems.
ID: 72971 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Theadalus

Send message
Joined: 6 Nov 05
Posts: 7
Credit: 9,945,810
RAC: 0
Message 72987 - Posted: 4 May 2012, 5:50:48 UTC

Client errors solved!

I lowered memory speed from 1600MHz to 1333MHz, and no 'segmentation violation' errors occured anymore.

Although mem specs said 1600MHz @ 1.5V (Corsair Vengeance 16GB Dual Channel Kit), and these setting gave no problems with other projects (Docking@Home), it seems it was too much for Rosetta.
ID: 72987 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile dcdc

Send message
Joined: 3 Nov 05
Posts: 1832
Credit: 119,821,902
RAC: 15,180
Message 72989 - Posted: 4 May 2012, 8:07:36 UTC - in response to Message 72987.  

Client errors solved!

I lowered memory speed from 1600MHz to 1333MHz, and no 'segmentation violation' errors occured anymore.

Although mem specs said 1600MHz @ 1.5V (Corsair Vengeance 16GB Dual Channel Kit), and these setting gave no problems with other projects (Docking@Home), it seems it was too much for Rosetta.

Might be worth giving it a run with Prime95 or similar for a couple of hours to make sure there aren't still some errors slipping through ;)
ID: 72989 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Randy Proctor

Send message
Joined: 24 Mar 10
Posts: 4
Credit: 600,055
RAC: 0
Message 73001 - Posted: 6 May 2012, 1:59:26 UTC - in response to Message 72987.  

Client errors solved!

I lowered memory speed from 1600MHz to 1333MHz, and no 'segmentation violation' errors occured anymore.

Although mem specs said 1600MHz @ 1.5V (Corsair Vengeance 16GB Dual Channel Kit), and these setting gave no problems with other projects (Docking@Home), it seems it was too much for Rosetta.


I hghly doubt 1600Mhz RAM is an issue, I built this PC with an i5 2500k and 1600 Mhz RAM 3 months ago and wasn't until a week ago I started noticing 70 percent of my jobs are failing with client errors....using 7.0.25
ID: 73001 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
P . P . L .

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 06
Posts: 581
Credit: 4,865,274
RAC: 0
Message 73011 - Posted: 7 May 2012, 5:38:03 UTC

Hi.

Looks like my first error with the new app, the first copy of this erred on a win machine. Bad task!


https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=459455025

rb_05_06_31142_62291__t000__0_C2_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_49563_1587_1

<core_client_version>6.10.58</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
process exited with code 193 (0xc1, -63)
</message>

Unpacking data: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/input_rb_05_06_31142_62291__t000__0_C2_robetta.zip
Setting database description ...
Setting up checkpointing ...
Setting up graphics native ...
BOINC:: Worker startup.
Starting watchdog...
Watchdog active.
# cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
Stack trace (16 frames):
[0xa965f87]
[0xf7771400]
[0xa028c01]
[0x9c1a810]
[0x9a5dea0]
[0x9a6065c]
[0x92cf301]
[0x8a0da95]
[0x94103f0]
[0x941306a]
[0x958f521]
[0x95f6c45]
[0x95f4475]
[0x80547ed]
[0xa9f5f18]
[0x8048131]

Exiting...

</stderr_txt>
]]>

ID: 73011 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Michael G.R.

Send message
Joined: 11 Nov 05
Posts: 264
Credit: 11,247,510
RAC: 0
Message 73015 - Posted: 7 May 2012, 14:42:35 UTC - in response to Message 72913.  

Version 3.30 also fixes the MacOS slowdown issue people were seeing with versions 3.24 and 3.26.


Thank you!
ID: 73015 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Rosetta@Home version 3.30



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org