Message boards : Number crunching : Question for Team Baker
Author | Message |
---|---|
stephan_t Send message Joined: 20 Oct 05 Posts: 129 Credit: 35,464 RAC: 0 |
Looking at users Robetta and Kel's computers - their RAC per computer is fairly low (dual xeons with racs of 30/day). Is it because you guys don't crunch for Rosetta full time, or limit the CPU usage? Just curious :) Team CFVault.com http://www.cfvault.com |
David Baker Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 705 Credit: 559,847 RAC: 0 |
We are running on the desktop computers in my group. BOINC is idle when we are doing calculations--for example, my machine has been busy trying to analyze all the 1hz6 data generated over the last several days! |
Daddygeek Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 12 Credit: 4,071,353 RAC: 1,821 |
So, it not the fact that it's running a Linux client? Then why is it when I was running Linux I was only getting half the results that my Windows machines get? The reason I'm asking is hopefully, by next week I will be running Linux on at least two more my machines(I changed them to windows to get the highest performance I could in Rosetta). Is there anything I can do to help get the performance on the Linux side of things to equal the Windows side? |
David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1018 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0 |
So, it not the fact that it's running a Linux client? The rosetta boinc source code will be available soon for people interested in helping with debugging and optimization. |
David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1018 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0 |
Also, we have it set up to stop when the computer is in use. |
stephan_t Send message Joined: 20 Oct 05 Posts: 129 Credit: 35,464 RAC: 0 |
Also, we have it set up to stop when the computer is in use. Thanks David & David - that makes sense :) Cheers! Team CFVault.com http://www.cfvault.com |
Charles Dennett Send message Joined: 27 Sep 05 Posts: 102 Credit: 2,081,660 RAC: 421 |
So, it not the fact that it's running a Linux client? The Linux core client is not optimized as well as the windows one. Therefore, the benchmarks it calculates are about half what they should be. That equates to about half the claimed credit a windows machine would ask for. Some Linux users (myself included) grab the source code and compile it ourselves so we can add the proper compiler options to optimize the code. A few people make optimized clients available for downloading for those that do not want to compile it themselves. Try these: http://boinc.truxoft.com/ http://naparst.name/ http://www.pperry.f2s.com/downloads.htm I still run 4.72 on my Linux box. I can't compile the 5.X series yet as I need to update the curl libraries on my Fedora Core 3 system first. I have not yet found any compiled 5.X clients out there yet. This will not make your machine crunch any faster since the core client's speed has nothing to do with any particular application. Hope this helps. -Charlie |
rbpeake Send message Joined: 25 Sep 05 Posts: 168 Credit: 247,828 RAC: 0 |
We are running on the desktop computers in my group. BOINC is idle when we are doing calculations--for example, my machine has been busy trying to analyze all the 1hz6 data generated over the last several days! This is wonderful news! Let's hope we can keep you very busy analyzing a vast quantity of results! ;) Regards, Bob P. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Question for Team Baker
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org