Message boards : Number crunching : horns5 work units
Author | Message |
---|---|
amgthis Send message Joined: 25 Mar 06 Posts: 81 Credit: 203,879,282 RAC: 0 |
These 'horns5' work units take too much memory for what I have available so I've taken to just deleting them. They typically suck ~ 4gigs of RAM on my boxes, and with 4 cores I end up going to swap memory and then I have paused jobs while the box waits to free up memory. I only have a few boxes with 16g of RAM most are at 8 and I think I might still have one or two with 4g which of course are barely adequate to run 4 cores and Rosetta. So I've upgraded most of those but they are older and DDR2 ram is needed. This morning I see another 'hornsx' flavor, maybe '1' or something I didn't write it down. Maybe they won't be so memory intensive. Anyhow I'm not trying to gum up stuff but I like to keep these 4 core cpus busy and not running at 50% while they wait for memory to free up. So that has been my 'fix'. /M |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 1 Dec 05 Posts: 1994 Credit: 9,571,918 RAC: 7,228 |
Anyhow I'm not trying to gum up stuff but I like to keep these 4 core cpus busy and not running at 50% while they wait for memory to free up. Boinc server scheduler can use AppPlan Plan classes are policies that allow the BOINC scheduler to decide: |
CallMeFoxie Send message Joined: 22 Mar 20 Posts: 8 Credit: 152,280 RAC: 0 |
Yup same for me, had to cancel all horns5* because the memory usage was far too much considering I run a plethora of 2GB SBCs. |
amgthis Send message Joined: 25 Mar 06 Posts: 81 Credit: 203,879,282 RAC: 0 |
Now this morning I find the 'True_Relax_SAVE_ALLxxxx' are sucking all available RAM and running the swap file up to the point where the box nearly dies. watch those, I'm wondering if they have a memory leak. Seems like it takes them 10 mins. or so before they really start 'sucking' it all up fast. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
horns5 work units
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org