Message boards : Number crunching : Changed "Target CPU run time": How does it take effect?
Author | Message |
---|---|
xii5ku Send message Joined: 29 Nov 16 Posts: 22 Credit: 13,815,783 RAC: 128 |
I was just reading the FAQ and searching the forum, asking myself, when I change the "Target CPU run time" setting in the web prefs, when will it take effect?
Does it affect only tasks in "Ready to start" state, or also already "Running" tasks, tasks suspended to RAM, tasks suspended to disk, tasks waiting for memory, ...? And for tasks in the various mentioned states, can it only lengthen them, or only shorten them, or can it both?
|
rjs5 Send message Joined: 22 Nov 10 Posts: 273 Credit: 23,054,272 RAC: 8,196 |
I was just reading the FAQ and searching the forum, asking myself, The Rosetta WU are typically longer than the TARGET time, so Rosetta chops up the job into pieces which are passed out to computers. The command line that starts the Rosetta WU on your computer has that "-cpu_run_time" value set as part of the WU. In a completed WU on my machine, the command line looks like below. The "-cpu_run_time 28800 " option in the command line says to run the job for 28,800 seconds and THEN when that decoy is finished, terminate the job. Rosetta WU sent out will reflect the -cpu_run_time in effect when the WU is sent. All WU already sent, will use the value in effect when the they were sent. command: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_4.07_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -relax::minimize_bond_angles 1 -ignore_unrecognized_res 1 -abinitio::rsd_wt_helix 0.5 -abinitio::rg_reweight 0.5 -abinitio::rsd_wt_loop 0.5 -in:file:native 00001.pdb -abinitio::fastrelax 1 -abinitio::use_filters false -out:file:silent_struct_type binary -relax::dualspace 1 -ex2aro 1 -relax::minimize_bond_lengths 1 -beta_cart 1 -relax::default_repeats 2 -abinitio::detect_disulfide_before_relax 1 -fr |
xii5ku Send message Joined: 29 Nov 16 Posts: 22 Credit: 13,815,783 RAC: 128 |
I currently have 12 hours set, and the tasks are running for 12 hours indeed. Yet the command line says "-cpu_run_time 28800" (8 h), both in client_state.xml and in /proc/${PID}/cmdline. Example: <command_line> -relax::minimize_bond_lengths 1 -frag9 00001.200.9mers -abinitio::use_filters false -ignore_unrecognized_res 1 -ex1 1 -out:file:silent_struct_type binary -ex2aro 1 -in:file:native 00001.pdb -abinitio::detect_disulfide_before_relax 1 -abinitio::rsd_wt_loop 0.5 -frag3 00001.200.3mers -beta 1 -optimization::default_max_cycles 200 -abinitio::fastrelax 1 -abinitio::rsd_wt_helix 0.5 -relax::default_repeats 2 -abinitio::increase_cycles 10 -beta_cart 1 -abinitio::rg_reweight 0.5 -relax::minimize_bond_angles 1 -relax::dualspace 1 -in:file:boinc_wu_zip DRH_curve_X_h30_l2_h20_l2_02149_2_2_loop_1_0001_one_capped_0001_fragments_data.zip -out:file:silent default.out -silent_gz 1 -mute all -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 28800 -watchdog -boinc:max_nstruct 600 -checkpoint_interval 120 -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 2643916 </command_line> |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
The BOINC Manager has to complete a few at the new target runtime to get the duration correction factor and then the target runtimes will start to reflect your new runtime preference. Just to add to comments from rjs5, I believe when each decoy or model is completed, it looks back at the average of how long your machine has been taking to complete the decoys of this task. It uses this to estimate the completion time of the next decoy. If the estimate exceeds your runtime preference, then the task is ended. This helps the runtime adjust to the actual specific task and to the actual host running the task. So, on average, the actual runtime should be slightly less than the target. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
xii5ku Send message Joined: 29 Nov 16 Posts: 22 Credit: 13,815,783 RAC: 128 |
Ah. I looked at 8 random tasks of mine, and 7 finished slightly before the target run time, only 1 task took mere 20 seconds longer than the target time. Furthermore, as I am on 12 h currently, I grep'ed the boinc data directory for 43200 and found:
|
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Oh, yes, that's correct. I forgot to point out that rjs5 was mistaken on that point. When you change the runtime preference, and you do the BOINC Manager update to the server, it changes all of the uncompleted tasks on your machine. For this reason I generally suggest changes be made gradually over time rather than one big jump. If you've got a day of work downloaded and change the runtime preference from 3 hours to 12 hours, now it will take 4 days to complete the work already downloaded. This can lead to missed deadlines. And BOINC Manager still doesn't understand how long these tasks take to run and this can lead to it requesting more work than will actually be completed in the time before the deadline. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
xii5ku Send message Joined: 29 Nov 16 Posts: 22 Credit: 13,815,783 RAC: 128 |
Maybe I should have titled this thread
to make it clearer what my questions were about. Meanwhile I learned from experiments:
+ tasks which were suspended to disk (and are resumed after the scheduler request) A note on suspend to disk: Tasks have a certain likelihood to fail with error when resumed.
I did not test systematically tasks which were suspended to RAM during the scheduler request. It seemed they are not modified either. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Changed "Target CPU run time": How does it take effect?
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org